top of page

Airbnb – Inclusive Brand Positioning Through "Belong Anywhere"

  • Writer: Mark Hub24
    Mark Hub24
  • Dec 31, 2025
  • 13 min read

Executive Summary

Airbnb's "Belong Anywhere" campaign, launched in July 2014, represented a fundamental repositioning of the company from a transactional accommodation marketplace to an aspirational brand centered on human connection and belonging. This case study examines the strategic rationale, execution, and outcomes of this brand transformation using only verified, publicly available information. The repositioning coincided with Airbnb's evolution from a startup to a global hospitality platform, ultimately leading to its December 2020 IPO with a market capitalization of approximately $100 billion on its first day of trading.


MarkHub24

Company Background

Airbnb was founded in August 2007 by Brian Chesky, Joe Gebbia, and Nathan Blecharczyk in San Francisco. According to Chesky in multiple public interviews, the concept originated when he and Gebbia rented out air mattresses in their apartment to attendees of a design conference who couldn't find hotel rooms. The company was originally named "AirBed & Breakfast."


In a 2013 interview with Fast Company, Chesky stated that by early 2014, Airbnb had reached significant scale with listings in over 34,000 cities across 190 countries. However, the company faced perception challenges. According to a July 2014 article in Wired covering the rebrand launch, Airbnb was often viewed primarily as a budget accommodation option or a way for hosts to make extra money, rather than as a transformative travel experience.


Strategic Context Leading to Repositioning


Market Position and Perception Challenges

By 2014, Airbnb had achieved substantial growth but faced several brand perception issues. In an interview with AdWeek in July 2014, Chesky acknowledged that the company needed to articulate a larger purpose beyond transactional home-sharing. He stated, "We realized we weren't in the business of helping people book spaces. We're in the business of helping people belong wherever they are in the world."


According to Fast Company's coverage of the rebrand, research conducted by Airbnb revealed that guests were seeking more than just accommodations—they wanted authentic local experiences and connections with communities they visited. However, this emotional dimension of the product was not effectively communicated in the company's existing brand identity.


Competitive Landscape

The 2014 period saw increasing competition in the short-term rental space. HomeAway (later acquired by Expedia) and VRBO were established players, while new entrants were emerging. Traditional hotel chains were also beginning to acknowledge the threat posed by home-sharing platforms. According to a 2014 report by Morgan Stanley (covered by CNBC), the hotel industry was starting to view Airbnb as a significant competitive force, particularly in urban markets.


Trust and Safety Concerns

Airbnb also faced ongoing challenges related to trust and safety. Media coverage of isolated negative incidents, concerns about discrimination on the platform, and regulatory battles in major cities like New York and San Francisco created headwinds for the brand. According to a July 2014 article in The New York Times, the company needed to establish itself as a trustworthy, mainstream option rather than a risky alternative to hotels.


The "Belong Anywhere" Rebrand: Strategy and Execution


Strategic Rationale

In a July 2014 blog post announcing the rebrand, Chesky articulated the strategic vision: "For so long, people thought Airbnb was about renting houses. But really, we're about home. You see, a house is just a space, but a home is where you belong. And what makes this global community so special is that for the very first time, you can belong anywhere. That is the idea at the core of our company: belonging."


According to DesignStudio, the London-based creative agency that partnered with Airbnb on the rebrand (as reported in The Verge, July 2014), the strategic objective was to shift perception from a functional service (finding a place to stay) to an emotional promise (feeling at home anywhere in the world).


The Bélo Symbol

The most visible element of the rebrand was a new logo called the "Bélo," designed to symbolize belonging. In Airbnb's official announcement, the company explained that the symbol was created to represent four concepts: people, places, love, and Airbnb (with the 'A' shape). According to the July 2014 Wired article, the symbol was intentionally designed to be open-source, allowing the Airbnb community to customize and personalize it.


Chesky told Fast Company in July 2014 that the logo was meant to be "a symbol of belonging" and that "it's the first thing that can scale that can mean something different to everyone who uses it." The company encouraged hosts and guests to share their own versions of the symbol, attempting to create participatory branding.


Campaign Elements and Messaging

The "Belong Anywhere" campaign included several key components, as documented in trade publications and company announcements:


Video Content: Airbnb released a series of films featuring real hosts and guests sharing stories about connection and belonging. According to Adweek's July 2014 coverage, these narratives focused on emotional moments rather than property features or pricing.

Global Rollout: The campaign launched simultaneously across multiple markets. According to Marketing Week (July 2014), Airbnb invested significantly in outdoor advertising, digital media, and television in key markets including the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Australia.

Host and Guest Stories: The company created a storytelling platform on its website where community members could share experiences. According to TechCrunch coverage from July 2014, this user-generated content was intended to provide authentic testimonials supporting the belonging narrative.

Brand Guidelines: Airbnb published open-source brand guidelines, inviting the community to engage with and personalize the Bélo symbol. This approach was documented in design publications including Creative Review (August 2014).


Internal Alignment

According to a 2016 Harvard Business School case study on Airbnb (publicly available through HBS's case collection), the rebrand required significant internal alignment. Chesky reportedly spent months working with the executive team and employees to define the company's mission and ensure the "Belong Anywhere" positioning reflected authentic company values and operational realities.


In a 2014 Fortune interview, Chesky stated that the rebrand was not merely a marketing exercise but represented "a fundamental shift in how we think about what we do." The company reorganized certain teams and modified product development priorities to align with the belonging mission, according to the same Fortune coverage.


Implementation Challenges and Controversies


Logo Reception

The Bélo symbol received mixed reactions upon launch. According to coverage in The Guardian (July 2014), design critics and social media users noted the logo's resemblance to other symbols and logos, with some commentary focusing on unintended visual associations. However, no verified information is publicly available on whether these reactions materially impacted the campaign's effectiveness or Airbnb's business metrics.


Discrimination Issues

The "Belong Anywhere" positioning faced significant credibility challenges related to discrimination on the platform. In 2016, a Harvard Business School study (published in the journal of Economics) found evidence of racial discrimination against African American guests on Airbnb. According to widespread media coverage including The New York Times and The Washington Post in 2016, guests with distinctively African American names were roughly 16 percent less likely to be accepted than identical guests with distinctively white names.


In September 2016, Airbnb responded by publishing a report titled "Airbnb's Work to Fight Discrimination and Build Inclusion" authored by former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and former ACLU director Laura Murphy. According to the report (publicly available on Airbnb's website), the company acknowledged that discrimination was occurring on the platform and announced policy changes including reduced prominence of guest photos, mandatory anti-discrimination training for hosts, and the creation of a new anti-discrimination policy.


Chesky addressed the issue in a September 2016 blog post, stating: "Bias and discrimination have no place on Airbnb, and we have zero tolerance for them... We believe that by addressing this challenge directly, we can help create a more inclusive world." This acknowledgment indicated that the "Belong Anywhere" promise was aspirational rather than descriptive of the platform's reality at that time.


Regulatory Challenges

The rebrand period coincided with intensifying regulatory battles. According to reporting in The Wall Street Journal and Reuters throughout 2014-2015, Airbnb faced legal challenges and regulatory restrictions in major markets including New York City, San Francisco, Barcelona, and Paris. These conflicts centered on allegations that short-term rentals violated housing laws, reduced long-term housing availability, and operated outside hotel regulatory frameworks.


While the "Belong Anywhere" campaign focused on emotional connection and travel experiences, regulators and housing advocates argued that Airbnb's business model created negative community impacts. According to a 2015 report by the New York Attorney General (publicly available), some hosts were operating multiple properties as de facto hotels, contradicting Airbnb's narrative of authentic home-sharing and community integration.


Outcomes and Business Impact


Growth Metrics

Specific attribution of business outcomes to the "Belong Anywhere" campaign is challenging due to limited publicly disclosed data. However, Airbnb's overall growth trajectory during and after the rebrand period is documented:


According to Airbnb's December 2020 IPO prospectus (filed with the SEC and publicly available), the company grew from 550,000 listings at the end of 2013 to 5.6 million listings globally by the end of 2019. Guest arrivals increased from 21 million in 2013 to 327 million in 2019, as stated in the same prospectus.


The IPO prospectus does not attribute specific growth percentages to the rebrand campaign, and no verified public information is available quantifying the campaign's isolated impact on bookings, brand awareness, or market share changes.


Brand Perception Evolution

In a 2016 interview with Fortune, Chesky stated that Airbnb had "fundamentally changed the conversation from 'what is Airbnb' to 'Airbnb is about belonging.'" However, no independently verified brand tracking studies showing pre- and post-campaign perception changes are publicly available.


According to coverage in Bloomberg Businessweek (2017), Airbnb evolved from being perceived primarily as a budget accommodation alternative to being recognized as a distinct travel category. The article cited unnamed industry analysts suggesting the rebrand contributed to this perception shift, though specific measurement data was not provided.


Platform Evolution

Following the rebrand, Airbnb expanded its product offerings in ways that aligned with the "Belong Anywhere" positioning. According to company announcements and media coverage:


Experiences: In November 2016, Airbnb launched "Experiences," allowing hosts to offer activities and tours. According to Chesky in a November 2016 TechCrunch interview, Experiences was designed to deepen the belonging mission by facilitating local connections beyond accommodation. By 2019, according to the IPO prospectus, over 40,000 Experiences were available in more than 1,000 cities.

Trips: The company briefly offered a "Trips" product bundling accommodations, experiences, and local recommendations. This product was later discontinued, according to 2019 reporting in The Information, though Experiences continued as a standalone offering.

Community Commitment: In 2018, Airbnb launched the "Open Homes" program (later renamed Airbnb.org), allowing hosts to provide free or subsidized housing to people in crisis situations including refugees and disaster survivors. According to company announcements and coverage in Fast Company (2018), this initiative was positioned as an extension of the belonging mission into social impact.


IPO and Market Validation

Airbnb's December 2020 IPO provided market validation of the company's brand and business model. According to the IPO prospectus and widespread financial media coverage, the company's market capitalization reached approximately $100 billion on its first day of trading, significantly exceeding pre-IPO expectations.


In the prospectus, Airbnb's mission statement was: "Create a world where anyone can belong anywhere, providing healthy travel that is local, authentic, diverse, inclusive and sustainable." This formulation demonstrated the continued centrality of the belonging concept six years after the 2014 rebrand.


The prospectus noted challenges including the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on travel and ongoing regulatory uncertainties, but positioned Airbnb's brand strength and community as competitive advantages. Specific quantification of brand value or the financial contribution of the "Belong Anywhere" positioning was not provided in the prospectus.


Strategic Analysis


Positioning Strategy

The "Belong Anywhere" rebrand represents a textbook example of emotional brand positioning, shifting focus from functional product attributes (accommodations with specific features and prices) to emotional benefits (connection, belonging, authentic experiences). This approach aligns with classic marketing frameworks including Maslow's hierarchy of needs, positioning Airbnb as addressing higher-order needs for love, belonging, and self-actualization rather than merely basic shelter needs.


According to brand strategy frameworks discussed in academic marketing literature, emotionally positioned brands can command premium positioning, build stronger customer loyalty, and create differentiation that is more defensible than functional attributes. However, such positioning also creates vulnerability when brand promise and reality diverge, as evidenced by the discrimination controversies.


Platform vs. Brand Tension

Airbnb faced inherent tensions between its role as a two-sided platform (connecting hosts and guests) and its aspirations as a mission-driven brand. The company could not fully control the experiences occurring on its platform, creating risks to brand promise delivery. The discrimination issues highlighted this challenge: while corporate leadership espoused inclusive belonging, individual hosts' biased behaviors created experiences contradicting the brand promise.


This tension is characteristic of platform businesses, as discussed in academic literature on platform strategy. Platforms must balance scalability and openness with quality control and brand consistency. Airbnb's response through policy changes and community education represented an attempt to align host behaviors with brand values, though no verified information is publicly available measuring the effectiveness of these interventions.


Timing and Market Context

The 2014 rebrand timing proved strategically appropriate in retrospect. The sharing economy concept was gaining mainstream acceptance, millennial travelers were prioritizing experiences over possessions (a trend documented in numerous consumer research reports from firms including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley in 2014-2016), and digital platforms were increasingly viewed as transformative rather than merely transactional.


By articulating a higher-order mission, Airbnb potentially positioned itself for greater longevity than competitors focused solely on functional value (price savings, inventory selection). However, no verified comparative data is publicly available directly measuring brand strength differences between Airbnb and competitors during this period.


Limitations of Available Information

Several key aspects of the "Belong Anywhere" campaign and its outcomes lack publicly verified information:


Financial Investment: No verified information is publicly available regarding total marketing expenditure on the rebrand campaign or ongoing "Belong Anywhere" messaging.

Attribution Analysis: While Airbnb grew substantially post-rebrand, no publicly available data isolates the campaign's specific contribution versus other factors (product improvements, market expansion, overall sharing economy growth).

Brand Tracking Data: Internal brand tracking studies measuring awareness, perception, consideration, and preference changes are not publicly available. Media coverage cites unnamed sources or executives' subjective assessments but lacks independently verified quantitative data.

Competitive Impact: No verified information quantifies how the rebrand affected Airbnb's competitive position relative to HomeAway, VRBO, Booking.com, or hotel chains.

Host and Guest Response: While anecdotal stories were featured in campaign materials, no verified large-scale research on community response to the rebrand is publicly available.

Discrimination Mitigation Results: Following the 2016 policy changes addressing discrimination, no verified data has been publicly released measuring whether instances of discrimination decreased or whether guest acceptance rates became more equitable across demographic groups.

Long-term Brand Equity: Financial analysts' valuations of Airbnb include assumptions about brand value, but no verified methodology for isolating brand contribution to enterprise value has been made public.


Key Lessons


Lesson 1: Emotional Positioning Creates Differentiation and Vulnerability

Airbnb's shift to emotional positioning successfully differentiated the brand from competitors focused on functional benefits. However, this positioning also created accountability to a higher standard. When experiences on the platform contradicted the "Belong Anywhere" promise (through discrimination or negative incidents), the gap between promise and reality generated greater criticism than if the company had maintained purely functional positioning.

The discrimination challenges highlighted that emotional brand promises require operational delivery mechanisms. Airbnb's subsequent policy interventions represented recognition that aspiration requires implementation. Companies considering similar emotional positioning must ensure organizational capabilities and incentive structures align with brand promises.

Lesson 2: Platform Businesses Face Unique Brand Management Challenges

As a platform connecting independent hosts and guests, Airbnb could not control experiences as directly as traditional hospitality companies. The company attempted to shape behaviors through policies, community education, and product design (for example, reducing prominence of guest photos to mitigate bias). This approach represents a platform-appropriate brand management strategy, though its effectiveness remains imperfectly measured in public information.

Traditional brand management emphasizes consistency of experience across touchpoints. Platform businesses must instead build brand through community values, shared mission, and mechanisms that encourage desired behaviors while maintaining the openness that makes platforms valuable.

Lesson 3: Inclusive Positioning Requires Inclusive Reality

The "Belong Anywhere" message explicitly promised inclusion and belonging for all users. When research revealed that African American guests faced discrimination, the gap between promise and reality became a major brand crisis. Chesky's acknowledgment and policy responses represented an appropriate crisis management approach, but also illustrated that inclusive brand positioning creates accountability to deliver inclusive experiences.

Organizations considering inclusive positioning must audit existing practices, measure equitable outcomes across demographic groups, and proactively address barriers to inclusion before making bold brand claims. Airbnb's experience suggests that inclusive branding should follow rather than precede inclusive operational reality.

Lesson 4: Mission-Driven Branding Can Support Business Model Defense

Airbnb faced significant regulatory challenges during and after the rebrand period. By positioning itself as a mission-driven company facilitating belonging and connection rather than merely a transaction platform, the company created a narrative that could engage supporters and policymakers. The community emphasis and host stories provided evidence of positive impacts that complemented economic arguments.

However, no verified information directly links the "Belong Anywhere" positioning to specific regulatory outcomes. The lesson is suggestive rather than definitive: mission-driven branding may create strategic options and stakeholder relationships that support business model defense, particularly for platform businesses facing regulatory scrutiny.

Lesson 5: Brand Repositioning Requires Long-Term Consistency and Investment

The "Belong Anywhere" positioning introduced in 2014 remained Airbnb's core message through its 2020 IPO and beyond. This consistency allowed the positioning to become associated with the company and supported cumulative brand building. Product decisions (such as launching Experiences) reinforced the belonging mission.

Organizations frequently update brand campaigns annually or more often, potentially preventing any single message from gaining traction. Airbnb's sustained commitment to belonging demonstrates that successful repositioning requires multi-year consistency, though this observation is based on qualitative assessment rather than quantitative proof of causation.


Conclusion

Airbnb's "Belong Anywhere" rebrand represented a strategic shift from functional to emotional brand positioning, attempting to differentiate the company and support expansion beyond budget accommodation into mainstream travel. The campaign illustrated both opportunities and challenges of emotional platform branding.


While Airbnb achieved substantial growth and a successful IPO in subsequent years, direct attribution of these outcomes to the rebrand versus other factors (product improvements, market expansion, overall sharing economy growth) is not possible based on publicly available information. The campaign's most verified outcome was establishing "belonging" as Airbnb's recognized core message and mission.


The discrimination controversies revealed tensions between aspirational brand messaging and operational realities, prompting policy changes that demonstrated management's commitment to aligning practice with promise. This evolution illustrated that emotional brand positioning creates accountability but also provides strategic direction for organizational development.


As Airbnb continues to evolve, the durability and limitations of the "Belong Anywhere" positioning will continue to be tested through regulatory challenges, competitive dynamics, and changing consumer expectations. The case provides valuable lessons about platform brand management, inclusive positioning requirements, and the multi-year commitment needed to successfully reposition an established brand.


Discussion Questions for MBA Analysis


Question 1: Strategic Positioning Choice Was Airbnb's decision to position emotionally around "belonging" rather than functionally around value (price/selection) the optimal strategic choice given the company's competitive context in 2014? Analyze the risks and benefits of this positioning decision. Consider how alternative positioning strategies (for example, emphasizing value, variety, or authentic local experiences without the belonging framework) might have created different opportunities and vulnerabilities. What criteria should executives use to choose between functional and emotional brand positioning?

Question 2: Platform Brand Management How should platform businesses approach brand management given their limited direct control over user experiences? Evaluate Airbnb's approach to shaping host and guest behaviors to align with brand promises. What additional mechanisms could platforms implement to ensure brand promise delivery? Consider trade-offs between openness (allowing diverse hosts and listings) and control (ensuring consistent experiences). How should platform companies balance these tensions?

Question 3: Inclusive Branding and Operational Delivery When the Harvard study revealed racial discrimination on Airbnb's platform, how effectively did the company respond? Evaluate the policy changes announced in the 2016 Holder-Murphy report. What should the company have done before launching "Belong Anywhere" to ensure inclusive experiences? More broadly, what standards should apply before companies make inclusive brand claims? Should companies only make aspirational claims about inclusion they currently deliver, or is it acceptable to use inclusive branding as a commitment that drives internal change?

Question 4: Measuring Brand Campaign ROI Given the limited publicly available data directly attributing business outcomes to the "Belong Anywhere" campaign, how should executives evaluate brand repositioning investment decisions? What metrics and measurement approaches would provide useful signals about campaign effectiveness? Consider both quantitative measures (brand tracking, attribution analysis) and qualitative indicators. How should executives balance short-term measurable outcomes with long-term brand building that may resist precise measurement?

Question 5: Long-term Brand Strategy Evolution Looking forward from Airbnb's 2020 IPO to its future evolution, should the company maintain the "Belong Anywhere" positioning or evolve to a different brand strategy? Consider factors including: market maturity (is belonging a relevant message as home-sharing becomes mainstream?), competitive dynamics (how have competitors responded?), regulatory environment (does belonging positioning help or hinder regulatory relationships?), and product evolution (as Airbnb expands into new categories, does belonging remain applicable?). What would constitute evidence that a repositioning is needed versus staying the course?


Comments


© MarkHub24. Made with ❤ for Marketers

  • LinkedIn
bottom of page